Saturday, February 25, 2012

Secret Compartments? Oh My...!

Hat tip to Radley Balko at The Agitator for this story. Governor John Kasich says that drug smugglers are using secret compartments to smuggle drugs! If only there were no secret compartments, drug smugglers would find something else to do! Secret compartments must be banned!

Quote from, "A proposed state law, advocated by Gov. John Kasich, would make it a fourth-degree felony to own a vehicle equipped with secret compartments. A conviction would mean up to 18 months in jail and a potential $5,000 fine."

This is no joke. Soon, after the Fine Governor signs the bill, having secret compartments in your motor vehicle will be a felony. It doesn't matter that you had no illegal substances with you. It doesn't matter that you had no criminal intent (secret compartments show intent, no?). It doesn't matter that you are traveling down the road, as you have every right to do and are harming no one.

Then this gem, again from the piece on, "“A lot of the people that are dealing these drugs are after our kids,” Kasich said at a news conference. “When you see something, call this number.”"

It's for the children! Don't you get it? Governor Kasich cares more for the children than you do! If you see that your neighbor has a hidden compartment, SNITCH! For the love of humanity, SNITCH!

Someone has decided for you, that you don't NEED to. I mean, really, prove you NEED TO exercise all that freedom. If you cannot prove a need (the paternalist standard of proof and need are ever nebulous and non-specific), then you do not deserve. Do you see how this works?

Again from, "A draft of the law describes a hidden compartment as a “space, box, or other closed container” that is added, modified or attached to an existing vehicle."

So, do not attempt to hide a personal defense weapon in your vehicle. Do not attempt to secure your valuables in your automobile when you travel. Lay your soul bare, lest ye be accused! Can you say "asset forfeiture"? Can you spell "confiscation"?

Photos from, found via google search.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Just Trying To Do The Right Thing...

See this  from the about one of those "really good guys" in Law Imposement. He was out there trying to do the right thing. Protecting and serving and all that.

"Yeah, I broke the law. So what?" says Sheriff Baca.

This is a symptom, not the disease.

Sheriff's deputies in Las Angeles County, are you nothing but gangsters? Are you thugs with badges, sworn to none but the Gang leader who makes sure you are paid? Do any of you take your oath of office seriously?

See this from for an illustration of what gangsterism is. He admits he broke election law but isn't going to do the right thing because, "...his violation is not related to department business."

In other words, he doesn't want to. Holding himself accountable would be inconvenient. How convenient for the rest of you in the the LA County Sheriff's Department! You can now do anything fucking thing you want to do! Your sheriff is compromised! He'll back you, no matter what you do!

Read more here:

If the sheriff gets away with breaking the law while in office, is there any doubt the rest of you will get away with breaking any law you choose to, while you perform you "official duties"? What act then becomes "official" and a "duty"? Would it be anything the sheriff directs you to do? Anything your conscience directs?

If there are ANY good men left in local Law Imposement...


Now, whatcha gonna do about Sheriff Baca? Nothing? Thought so.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Feds Set 'em Up and Knock 'em Down

Read this piece from about how the Feds are making us safe from "terrorists".

Quote from the piece, "The FBI insisted that Congressmen were never in any danger from the manufactured plot, assuring everyone that it was “all very controlled.”"

Yup! Set 'em up and knock 'em down! Its the American (Law Imposement) Way!

Saturday, February 18, 2012

They'll Call us Names No Matter What We Do

This piece by TL Davis hits the ball outta the park. We must stop engaging the enemy on his terms. They'll call us names no matter what we do. No amount of niceness we can offer will cause our enemies to be nice back to us, but niceness is what they demand. If we use accurate and descriptive terms, according to them it is "name calling". If we stick to our principles we are being "obstructionist", "obstinate", and "unwilling to compromise". If we get too close to the elemental truth and dare to expose communists for what and who they are, we are being "haters".

Remember, folks, objectivity is not found halfway between the truth and a lie. There can be no compromise between food and poison. There is no liberty while one is wearing shackles, no matter how loose their fit, no matter how fuzzy the lining. 

Quote from TL:

"Give me a fight between a staunch communist and an advocate of capitalism before you give me a debate between a cowardly Democrat, which is a communist in modern clothing, and a Republican, which is a socialist in traditional garb."


"To the politicos it is all a game where they hold the power and dictate the rules of conduct. I reject that, I refute that. I am an American and my rights are not dictated, or allowed, or earned, they are bestowed upon me at birth and continue until death. Where the government has done what it is not allowed and has been supported in that by an elitist few justices it is nothing other than an oligarchy, not a democracy, not a republic and, if this is not a republic, we are orphans, we are in exile to the nation we inhabit."

Go read it all now. It is worth five or ten minutes.

Good work TL!

Friday, February 17, 2012

Al Gore Supports Capitalism, but, but, but...

This piece is from Reuters.  It seems Al Gore is a big Supporter of Capitalism, as it is "... superior to any other system for organising economic activity..."

Oh really, Mr. Gore? So you think the purpose of freedom and free enterprise is the "organisation (sic) of economic activity" ? Organized by whom? By you? If directed by you, Mr. Gore, then it isn't free enterprise, is it? If it is under your control, it isn't freedom at all. 

That is the point isn't it? You want control. The whole purpose of socialism/communism, isn't about distribution, nor is it about fairness, nor is it about what is best for "the people". It is about Control. You believe YOU will be in control once you socialist "sustainable capitalism" utopia is achieved. 

Quote from the Reuters piece, ""While we believe that capitalism is fundamentally superior to any other system for organising economic activity, it is also clear that some of the ways in which it is now practised do not incorporate sufficient regard for its impact on people, society and the planet," Gore said."


"... do not incorporate sufficient regard for its impact on people, society and the planet,"

 Here is the selling point. It always is the same. The implication and accusatory tone, "You don't care enough! I care more than you do, therefor I should be in control of everything and everybody! Then, I'll decide how much I think you need!"

The Communist slogan is, "From each according to his ability (Slavery, demanding your best effort at the point of a gun), to each according to his need (Decided by whom? Prove your need, if you can't, then you do not deserve...).

When I was growing up, any time I would ask my step-father for permission to do something, or go somewhere, my request was always met first with, 

"You think you need to?" 

I knew instinctively that there was no way I would be able to "prove" a "need" in order to gain permission.  You see, he was a Control Freak. He didn't care at all what effect this technique would have on me. He just knew that it worked. It got me to shut up. It put me on "pause".

Apply this to macro economics. Each person at the micro-economic level, must beg permission from some bureaucrat before gaining "license" to exercise his "freedom". This leads to economic stagnation at the macro-economic level. Control freaks know this full well. They don't care. Control is it's own reward. They want absolute control. Everything else is window dressing. 

Federal Agents Shoot Each Other!

Or, "Another Case of Workplace Violence"

OK, the heart of the matter in this story from Yahoo news, is that one ICE agent shot another ICE agent in a fit of rage. A third ICE agent shot the shooter, killing him.

This is a shame. Let us not make light of it.

I would ask, though, where is the Brady Bunch? Why do we not hear them demanding that all Federal Agents be disarmed inside Federal Buildings? Why no screeching of, "See! See what happens?"

Federal agents, how about we disarm ALL Federal Law Imposement agents in all Federal buildings? No? Not a good idea? Then why is it a good idea when you demand my disarmament? After all, you never know when a Federal agent will "just snap" and start shooting people.

What? You don't think that way? Then why aren't you vocal, each of you individually and through your organizations, opposing politicians and others when they call for restrictions on my rights? Each time Eric Holder, or his boss the Usurper in Chief, or Madame Secretary Clinton, or Up-Chuck Schumer, calls for another 'salt weapons ban, I hear nothing but eerie silence from all you "really good guys".

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Mass Murder. Let us NEVER Forget

This is the latest from Michael McNulty's blog on Waco.

A mass murder was committed and no person has been held to account for it. Let us never let this story rest until the murderous thugs have been brought to justice.

Patrick Henry said...

Quote: "Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it"


Again, "We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren..."

Isn't this exactly what most Americans are doing today?

Do principles apply? Do our feelings, or today's circumstances, overcome principles?

Go here and read it all

You Should read Cliffs of Insanity

Go read this at Cliffs of Insanity.

Just go read!

If Your Dog Bit a Police Officer....

See this piece about a police dog jumping out and chewing on a runner passing by. Then ask yourself, what would happen to YOU, and what would happen to YOUR dog, if yours did the exact same thing to an off duty policeman out for his morning run. Remember, you're not an Only One.

Hat tip to Radley Balko at The Agitator for the link.

On a parallel note, it seems this is not a singular event. It happens from time to time.

See this piece at Otago Daily Times of New Zealand.

It seems a Police dog handler was visiting a kindergarten and the dog decided to bite Tyler on the face. The police handler, speaking of the dog, reassured the child, 

"Oh, he's not usually like that. I'll talk to him..."

Monday, February 13, 2012

A Very Good, and Long Video

This is a moderated discussion between Justcices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer. It shows, strikingly, the difference between calm rational thought and whimsical emotion.

Give yourself some time. Watch and enjoy. 

Justice Breyer Robbed at Machete Point!

This is from World Net Daily. It seems Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer has been robbed. The perp used a machete! Of all the unmitigated gall! A machete!

Quote from WND: "Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer was robbed last week by an intruder armed with a machete while Breyer was vacationing on the Caribbean island of Nevis, court officials said Monday. Breyer, his wife and two other guests were in the justice’s vacation home at the time, but officials said no one was hurt in the incident. The male assailant took $1,000 in cash and fled the scene..."

All I can say is, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving fellow.

This is the same Supreme Court Justice who said in the Heller case, speaking of your right to keep personal weaponry,

"The majority’s conclusion is wrong for two independent reasons. The first reason is that set forth by Justice Stevens—namely, that the Second Amendment protects militia-related, not self-defense-related, interests."

"But self-defense alone, detached from any militia-related objective, is not the Amendment’s concern."

"The second independent reason is that the protection the Amendment provides is not absolute. The Amendment permits government to regulate the interests that it serves. Thus, irrespective of what those interests are—whether they do or do not include an independent interest in self-defense—the majority’s view cannot be correct unless it can show that the District’s regulation is unreasonable or inappropriate in Second Amendment terms." Can you spell Circular Logic?

"...I shall not assume that the Amendment contains a specific untouchable right to keep guns in the house to shoot burglars."

You may read more of his nonsense if you want. I choose not to. If you want to see calm rational logic juxtaposed with irrational, emotional whim, then watch this video from C-SPAN.

She Didn't Submit, Shoot Her! Shoot Her Dead!

The cops tell one story, which makes no sense, but is the official version of events. Being that it is THE official version, we mere mortals are obligated to believe it. After all it was on TV!

You and I are supposed to blindly believe that the Benevolent Knights of the Magic Shield can do no wrong, therefor, "She musta dunn sump'n..."

The Cops make up what ever story they want to. They then feed it to a lapdog press, which dutifully regurgitates what it is told. In this case, a peaceful woman, known to many in her community, went nuts, rolled up her vehicle window on the cop's arm and attempted to drag him down the street. That may be thin, but that's what they got so they're running with it.

But, there was an eye witness. Ahaa! They didn't count on that.

Now the denial phase begins. Probably, between the time when the official investigation commences and the inevitable whitewash/exoneration is pronounced, the eye witness will be bullied into changing his story. Any amount of thuggery is authorized as long as the desired result is achieved.

And finally, the last chapter can be written about an "...event shrouded in controversy" in which a woman was murdered for failure to demonstrate the proper depths submission by groveling at the feet of a thug in a superhero costume.

A couple of years ago, an acquaintance of mine was running for sheriff. He was talking to a group of voters about officer safety. He described how, when a Policeman approaches a subject, especially in a traffic stop situation, he never can never know the subject's intentions. The subject may very well be intent on murdering the Policeman. If elected all of his officers should and would be extremely vigilant in these situations.

Logic overtook my sense of decorum and I said,

"Say, Stan, when a Policeman approaches me, he is armed. He has the full power of the State behind him.  His story, or his version of events, if you will, carries more weight than mine in any Court of Law. He could very well kill me if he decides to and ONLY his version of events would be told. He can make up anything he wants to about "furtive movements" and "reaching for a weapon", etc.  His co-workers will cover for him in any way they can. He could very well have my demise in mind as he approaches. Given all of that, Shouldn't every citizen of this community be extremely vigilant when dealing with Policemen? Shouldn't they be prepared to defend their lives when Officer Friendly approaches? After all, he believes from the start that I probably intend to kill him. Shouldn't I have the same attitude?"

What he said next floored me,

"Well, first off, I don't believe most Officers have that attitude..."

Folks, Officer Friendly is NOT there to help you, logical contradictions notwithstanding.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Fast and Furious Fix is in, or...

 Tom Tancredo nails John Boehner (so to speak)

This is a piece which caught my eye from World Net Daily.

Tom has figured it out, or at least someone has told him what is going on. Backroom deals are happening, folks. John Boehner, Mr. Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, is twisting arms to derail Congressman Issa's investigation.

In D.C., snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is an art form. 

Money quote from the WND piece: "The reported “deal” Boehner and Holder are discussing would let higher ups in the Department of Justice off the hook if they prosecute one or two individual ATF supervisors. Holder would then claim he “cleaned up the mess” and be free from any moral or political culpability. How does that sound, folks?"

Also, Mike, at Sipsey Street Irregulars, has some strong words. It looks like we, the American people, are going to take it in the ass again.

Lord in heaven, I hope some in D.C. and in federal Law Imposement are listening. 

Now That's Funny Right There!

I just love this photo!

If all Fire Departments were volunteer only, maybe cooler heads would prevail!

I saw the story on Drudge and he linked to this piece at the UK's Guardian. It seems that firefighters are pissed off about their retirements benefits being changed by the Government. So, some tools of the State will turn against other tools of the State when THEIR ox is being gored.

Thursday, February 09, 2012

More on Waco... Again

This is more information from Michael McNulty, producer of the film, WACO: The Rules of Engagement. It is  background information on his award winning films. He is telling details few have heard until now.

Go read it all. Then ask yourself, do you really think they are "good guys who mean well"? Are they stand-up guys who "just want to do the right thing"? Do you think they consider their Constitutional oath before they act?

Read it all and pass it along.

Expose the LIE!

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Gun Rights Examiner by David Codrea

Go here and read David's work. He lays it out every day for very little thanks or recognition.

"We must all hang together, or we most assuredly shall all hang separately."

Torturing Caged Animals

Go here to Injustice Everywhere and watch the cruiser cam. IJ links from 

The man in the backseat was being obnoxious. 

Is it fun to torture caged animals? Is it moral? Is it Lawful? What about caged human beings?

If you're a cop, you can do it right? Doesn't having a Super Hero costume and a Magic Shield make you impervious to being wrong? What the hell, you can always lie about it right? Nothing will happen to you anyway.

Thankfully, the deputy in the video has been fired by Indian River County, FL, because the video exists. If the video didn't exist, it didn't happen, right?

Do you still think Officer Friendly is there to help you?

Tennessee Lawmakers Grow Some Nuts

This is from the Tenth Amendment Center. It seems Tennessee legislators in both houses of their legilature, have crafted bills to prevent Federal forces from kidnapping anyone in Tennessee. It also provides penalties for agents of the Federal Government who kidnap citizens under the NDAA.

Quote from the piece: "The Tennessee bill also “makes it a Class E felony for any official, agent, or employee of the United States government to enforce or attempt to enforce any federal law, order, rule or regulation that is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution,” and includes provisions for kidnapping charges if a federal agent were to detain a U.S. citizen in Tennessee under the NDAA."

Good! Now where are the rest of the State legislatures?

And finally, the money quote:  “If what supporters say is true and the NDAA does not authorize indefinite detention of Americans, what is the harm in this legislation? Why would anybody oppose it? It does nothing but serve notice that state and local officials will not sit back and allow the federal government to exercise unconstitutional powers – powers supporters claim don’t exist anyway. It simply affirms a fence that supposedly already exists. The only rational I can find for opposing this bill is if they really do want the option of detaining Americans without due process to remain open,” he said. “You can only oppose this legislation if you accept the idea that the federal government has the authority to do whatever it wants with absolutely no check on its actions – Constitution be damned. If you ask me, that’s a lot scarier than whatever terrorist threat they claim to be protecting me from.”

Don't ya love it?

Georgia Judge Disregards Evidence

This is from the PPJ Gazette. That publication is found here.

The fraud that is Barack Obama will continue. He may be voted out of office, but his crimes will go unpunished. He executive orders will continue in effect as though they had the force of law. Bill he signed will be acted on as though they were Law, even though the person signing them was a usurper. The judge said all the evidence didn't matter. He wasn't persuaded.

Quote from the PPJ Gazette piece:

"Obama ’s name will remain on the Georgia primary ballot anyway.
Who got to him? Who threatened this judge or paid him off?
Judge Michael Malihi dismissed the following:
1. the charge that Barack Obama has a computer-generated fraudelent Hawaiian birth certificate,
2. possesses a fraudulent Social Security number and other invalid U.S. identification papers and
3. the charge that Mr. Obama is ineligible to be a candidate because his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth."

Then, "Judge Malihi’s decision will now go to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who will make the final determination."

Now, whatcha wanna bet...?

Perhaps Sheriff Joe Arpaio will release something substantial, as promised, on 01 March 2012. He has said it may shock some people. I doubt it, but we shall see.

TL Davis Hits One Outta Th' Park

Go read TL's piece here about who the extremists really are. He lays it out succinctly.

The fact that you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.

I say again, will we live as free men or as serfs?

Will we hold title to property, or will we be good puppies continually begging scraps from the master's table?

Do we have natural rights worthy of being defended or are we subjects with privileges extended by our political masters?

Would we, by our own will,  be Spartans or helots?

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

On a related note...

What would your response be to a man trying to commit suicide?

If you are a Henderson, NV police officer the answer is obvious!

Unconfirmed reports state that the lead officer shouted, "He's trying to commit suicide! Quick, shoot him before he hurts himself!"

If the man dies as a result of the suicide prevention attempt, the explanation is obvious. You use the Sheriff Will Teasle excuse, "People go fucking around with the Law and all hell breaks loose!"

See the LVRJ for details.

"Stop Resisting Motherfucker!"

This comes from the Las Vegas Review Journal online.

The video shows how Henderson Police and Nevada Highway Patrol officers dealt with, what they thought was, an intoxicated driver.

The first heroic officer seemed ready and anxious to shoot the man. When other heroic officers arrived,  they pull him from his vehicle, dog pile on him, and proceed to beat and kick him while shouting,

"Stop resisting Motherfucker!"

After the heroic officers, six of them mind you, finish beating and kicking the man, and finally get him cuffed, they discover insulin in his pocket and decide he might just be in insulin shock. Then they call for a medic. The man suffered cracked ribs and scrapes and bruises.

Then they all have a good laugh about how they just thumped some poor soul in insulin shock.

According to the LVRJ, the man and his wife will receive a total of $292,500.00 in compensation.

The Officers names are not disclosed. This, of course is for officer safety. They don't want it known who the thugs are lest someone decide to oppose their thuggery.

Does anyone still believe Officer Friendly is there to help you?

This will happen to you! The question is not "if", but "when". The thugs truly believe that since they wear a Super Hero Costume and bear a Magic Shield, they cannot be wrong. They see everyone but themselves as the enemy. They are willing and anxious to shoot and kill you. Federal Fusion centers and Homeland Security are actively cultivating that point of view. They demand submission and obeisance. To them, you are not a free man, but a mere "civilian" to be dominated and subjected to their whim.

All that is left then is, "What shall you do?"

Sunday, February 05, 2012

More on Waco

Friends, don't EVER let this story die until the mass murders, who made war on American citizens, have been brought to justice.

Go here and read. Notice the front door to the Davidian home/church which didn't burn up in the fire as the FBI (damned liars) said it did. Note the bullet holes in the door, the appearance of which which supports the Davidians' version of events.

All Americans owe Mike McNulty a debt of gratitude for his tireless work at exposing the truth.

Two from T L Davis

TL lays it out in a clear and concise manner. Go read them in order.

First read this one.

Next read this one.

Money quote: "The time for taking action is here, the time for doing more than talking has arrived. The Liberty Summit will soon reveal a place of congregation and soon we will make our stand against this tyranny, however soft it might seem to history, it is tyranny, it is criminal, it is a violation of law in the most fundamental form and all those who sit in government will be judged and the judgment will plague them through history."

Read them deliberately. Think about the RIGHT thing to do.

Fed-Goons, read them and then look in the mirror.

Thursday, February 02, 2012

A Candidate for Governor of Montana! posted this on their site. Salute, Elias! Thank you for reproducing it. I hope any candidate for Governor of any Free State has the nuts to say the same.

Here y'are:

Bob Fanning: The Only Candidate

I am Bob Fanning of Pray, Montana. I am running for Governor because I love Montana.

I am the only candidate who has a realistic, workable plan which will lead Montana to rapid economic progress and to independence from the Federal funds which have put Montana out of business.  I have the credentials to lead and restructure our state’s economy in today’s Federally-induced crisis. My 38 years of multifaceted financial experience and business leadership practices have built within me the diagnostic tools to understand, explain, and quantify exactly what caused the fraud-based mortgage crisis and other financial threats to Montana’s prosperity.

Make no mistake about it, Montana – the satchel charges that were placed, that blew up America’s economy, were placed by the 106th Congress.

Because those threats are coming from Wall Street and the Fed, I have a genuine plan to put Montanans back to work by removing Federal incursions which have impoverished our Counties and communities. I can open up Montana’s natural resources to development, industry, and jobs for Montanans by simply removing Federal blockages.

I am the only candidate who knows how and why to shut down the EPA, BLM, Forest Service, other Federal agencies and Departments, as well as the Department Of Justice enforcement groups such as DEA and ATF, and prevent their operation in Montana. I will use State interposition as Montana’s lawful answer to Federal corruption, and will faithfully and fully nullify (interpose to prevent) “Obama-Care” in Montana.

I will honor Montana’s medical marijuana referendum and protect the will of the people against Federal aggression.
I am the only candidate who will create a system of sound money based on hard assets including silver and gold.

I am the only candidate who is a proud member in Oath Keepers. I will prevent the Federal police state in Montana by shutting off State and County relations with the Fusion Centers of the Department of Homeland Security. My administration in Montana will break the interface between local peace officers and the U.S. military.

I am the only candidate who proactively supports the Fully Informed Jury Association.

I am the only candidate running with former Constitution Party 2008 Presidential candidate Dr. Chuck Baldwin as partner candidate for the office of Lieutenant Governor of Montana. Our ticket reads: Fanning/Baldwin2012. Our website is

I am a proud member in the Montana Shooting Sports Association. I am an avid 2nd Amendment advocate. I am the only candidate who will establish Montana’s Constitutional Militia, with an office in every County Commission to oversee and regulate militia development. I will support the authority of the County Sheriff by establishing a Montana office for the Constitutional Sheriffs And Peace Officers Association.

I am the only candidate who will shut down the U.S. Department of Education in Montana and return our schools to local control with parallel support for Home Schooling.
I am the only candidate who led the charge to de-list wolves in Montana and, as your Governor I will continue to diminish the wolf problem, rebuild Montana’s Elk and Moose populations while protecting farm animals, and insure Montana’s continued tradition of wild-game hunting. I am a strong believer in personal property rights of the individual as protected by the Montana and the Federal Constitutions.

I am the only candidate in the 2012 race who understands and vows to honor the Founders’ intent regarding the system of “dual sovereignty” preserved in the U.S. Constitution. I am the only candidate who understands how rebuilding Montana’s sovereignty under the Montana Constitution can free our people from Federal bondage.

I am the only candidate who will boot the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and related NGO detriments out of Montana. I will shut down ICLEI offices in Montana and expose the lies behind the UN’s use of the term “sustainable development”. I will boot the UN out of Montana.

I am the only candidate who knows how and why it is important to return personal responsibility and personal freedom to all Montanans. I believe Montanans can and will restore their once-proud independence and prosperity as my administration removes the Federal barriers and allows the bountiful treasure which is our birthright to once again flourish. I uphold Montana sovereignty.

I am the only candidate who has the courage and strength to get this done.

I am Bob Fanning of Pray, Montana. My creed is:
Life. Land. Liberty.

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

An Essay to Read

This is a powerful essay written by Brandon Smith. It is a long one. It should be read by all Liberty minded people.

If you are on the fence, GET THE FUCK OFF!!!

Linky here 

Money quote:  "Constitutional values cannot defend themselves. They require the people to stand firm, and to never yield. Americans today have yielded far too much already, and at some point very soon, we’re going to have to make the hard choice on what is more important; our general safety and personal comfort, or our freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Like the American Colonials, we have a system that does not serve our best interests, but the interests of an elite few. We are quickly losing our ability to dictate the terms of our own society, and our own destinies. Sadly, we are not yet presenting the determination that the colonials held in the face of this danger. Today, we are a nation mourning its own demise before it has even occurred. We have turned to reluctant compliance and submission. We are, frankly, whiny and pathetic."

Go read.

Life Liberty and Property


Feds Raid Wrong House

"'Tis some visiter," I muttered, "tapping at my chamber door —
            Only this and nothing more."
  Edgar Allan Poe

We have this from David Codrea at War On Guns in reference to a story from Sentinel and Enterprise newspaper in Massachusetts.

It seems a multi-agency task force headed by agents of the FBI decided to raid the wrong home. They began the raid with a chainsaw cutting through the front door of an apartment occupied only by a woman and her three year old daughter.

The goons terrorized the woman and her daughter for over half an hour, demanding to know where "Vasquez" was. The mother and daughter were held at gun point in separate rooms, you know, so they couldn't cook up a story between 'em, the mother unable to comfort her terrified daughter.

There are a couple of quotes to note from the Sentinel and Enterprise piece.

First, " About 10 FBI agents came into her apartment at 391 Elm St., that morning, guns drawn and pointed at her. There was no knock, and they didn't shout that they were from the FBI until after the saw was buzzing through her six-panel front door, she said." 

Hmmm, really? Was she, or the actual suspect had he been there, expected to be able to hear exactly what was being yelled at her while there was a chainsaw buzzing through her door? No? Thought not.

Second, "She believes it took about three minutes for them to saw a big rectangle through the door, then kick in the center. She shouted repeatedly that they had the wrong place." 

Really? What would the real bad guy have done? A better question would be, what would a righteous home-owner do when THUGS begin cutting through his front door early in the morning? If it takes more than a minute, the master of the house should well be able to repel any invasion... if he intended to.

As David Codrea pointed out, they screwed up big time... they failed to shoot the puppy! 

The goons eventually departed, saying "Uh, sorry." over their shoulder as they went. The John Belushi apology.

They do this, not because they believe it is the right thing to do, not because it is in compliance with the intent of the Fourth Amendment, but because the Courts have said they can get away with it. 

The following is a quote from The Constitution for the United States of America:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."  Ask yourself, honestly, is that principle in active practice now?

Folks, the question is not IF, but WHEN. When it happens to you, do you have a plan? Are you psychologically prepared to defend your home and bear the consequences which will come with it?

Your other option is to do what the Thugs expect you to do, which is: roll over, expose your belly, piss on yourself, whimper, grovel, and beg them not to murder you.

Finally, a note for the Goon Squad: You are rapidly losing the last shreds of what once was the fabric of credibility. Each time you do this another thread unravels.

Don't fucking care? Thought so.