I thought this was very clever. It could have been made into a long dramatic murder novel. But, brevity, they say, is the soul of wit.
Click the link below and read.
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
image found on Google
Go here and read a bit... if you want to know.
It is ALL fraud, all of it.
The FICTION "that because it was an excise tax, it was legal" (lawful) IS NOT TRUE. The power of the Federal Government is limited to its own property as stated in Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 17, and to "regulate Commerce with FOREIGN NATIONS, and among the "several" States, and with the Indian tribes;" as stated in Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3, 18 USC, Section 921, Definitions, states," The term 'interstate or foreign commerce' INCLUDES commerce between any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any POSSESSION of the United States ( not INCLUDING the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, but such term DOES NOT INCLUDE commerce between places within the same State, but through any place outside of that State. The term 'State' INCLUDES the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not INCLUDING the Canal Zone)." Only EMPLOYEES of the federal government, RESIDENTS of the District of Columbia, RESIDENTS of naval bases RESIDENTS of forts, U.S. Citizens of the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Territories, and insular possessions were lawfully required to file and pay the Victory Tax.
Remember, they are proud of themselves.
The State says, the cops is always right. If it was the cops what dunnit, it was the right thing to do, because it was the cops what dunnit. Why? Because the cops is always right. The cops is tools of the State and YOU ain't the State. Who says so? The State! Now, bend over and spread'em!
image found on Google
The fourth circuit court of appeals has declared that since you have decided to carry a gun, you categorically are a danger to yourself and others.
Do you understand that? The Government is saying that the exercise of a secured right makes you a danger to the Government. All government agents can treat you as such at their whim.
The story comes from National Review online.
This quote from the concurring opinion shows the Court's mindset:
In sum, individuals who carry firearms — lawfully or unlawfully — pose a risk of danger to themselves, law enforcement officers, and the public at large.
So, you are not the State. The State is the State and you are a danger to the State. Who is the State? Those who wear badges and those who wear robes are the State and YOU are a danger to them.
Do you get it?
One more question, and you will pardon me for being, uh, logical...
Are armed Policemen a danger to the millions and millions of "the people" who are not the State? Should I view every encounter with a policeman as a situation where my life is in mortal danger? If so, I should be able to disarm a Policeman, any policeman, anytime I experience an adverse emotional state, and force him to prove to me he has the authority to go around in State costume and carry a gun, using the Court's definition, at a danger to himself and others.
I can hear the refrain now. "Why don't you just go ahead and submit and comply?"
Yeah, that is just what FREE MEN do.
I know there are some policemen who read this blog. So, policemen, you say that YOU don't think this way? You say that YOU don't necessarily agree with this mindset?
They why don't we hear your voice opposing this crap? Why don't we hear you individually and through your professional organizations? Why are't you shouting from the roof tops, slingin in spit and blowin snot bubbles, that YOU and your brethren oppose the encroaching Police State?
I hear... crickets.
No importa. Conocemos la respuesta. Si?