A headline from Yahoo
This school was designated a "gun free zone". This school had restricted access. This school had lock-down procedures. The murderer went in and killed children anyway. He didn't obey the law. He paid no attention to the "No Guns Allowed" signs. He disregarded the Federal Gun Free School Zones Act. He knew there was a target rich environment full of innocent people who could not, BY LAW, defend themselves. Therefor he knew his bloody and murderous mission would be a success.
Now the panty wad class is screeching, "What is to be done"? I will tell you what will be done. There will be NOTHING done to prevent bad people from behaving badly. There will be extraordinary steps taken to create more victim disarmament zones and more target rich environments for murderers. There will be great progress made toward restricting what is left of your "right" to keep and bear arms.
Enemies of freedom began doing the Blood Dance before the shooting stopped.
Leftists in Congress will now propose, and get on the bandwagon for, a new "Assault Weapons Ban". They will permanently ban certain semi-auto firearms, and ban the possession of standard capacity ammunition magazines. Will this stop the next drugged up, miscreant, murderous, Manchurian candidate from doing evil deeds? Why, no! It will not. But it will make the panty wad class feel better, at least for a short time. Nothing will be done to stop the genuine bad guys. Everything will be done to restrict YOUR RIGHTS.
You think the "Republicans" will stop it? You think they "Conservatives" will stop it? Watch how fast your Congressman and Senators go quiet as this round of Anti Second Amendment, anti-liberty, anti-rights, legislation is brought forward. Many will turn coat publicly as they did in 1993 and 1994. Many will try to hide their votes and some who could stop it will simply not do so. They will show their true colors as Statists and power mongers.
You want a solution? Ok then.
Here are my suggestions. Government is not your daddy! Government cannot make you safe. Government can only restrict your freedom. Government goons do not want to help people, they want to wield power over them. Stop looking to Government and thinking Daddy will save you. He will, conversely, given the opportunity, kill you.
Want another suggestion? Arm yourself! Get standard weaponry and become proficient with their use. Get an AR-15 type rifle and as many standard capacity magazines as you can find. Get a Glock pistol and as many standard capacity magazines as you can lay your hands on. Practice. Practice! PRACTICE!
The Panty Wadders are now howling, "But I don't feel like more guns is the answer!" Re-read the first three paragraphs. Then re-read where I just told you, "Government is not your daddy! Government cannot make you safe." You are the only one responsible for your safety and security. You and you alone MUST provide for your own defense, or else live as a slave. Make up your mind.
My next suggestion is, stop sending your children to government indoctrination centers. They were not established for the purpose of education. They are forced indoctrination camps designed to turn out good little serfs who have no clue how to exercise the freedom which is their birthright! John Dewey, the Godfather of modern public "education", said the following,
"I believe that the only true education comes through the stimulation of
the child's powers by the demands of the social situations in which he
finds himself. Through these demands he is stimulated to act as a
member of a unity, to emerge from his original narrowness of action and
feeling and to conceive of himself from the standpoint of the welfare of
the group to which he belongs."
Translation, form the child into a mind-numbed part of the collective.
And, he said,
"I believe that this educational process has two sides - one psychological and one sociological..."
Translation, it is not the purpose of "education" to instruct, but to socialize. We will not give the child the tools he needs to succeed on his own in the real world, but force him to behave in the manner we wish him to behave in the new world we are creating.
Read John Dewey's sickening Pedagogic Creed here .
My next suggestion is this, if you want to ban something, ban all SSRI drugs. Each of these events has this class of drugs in common.
citalopram (Celexa, Cipramil, Cipram, Dalsan, Recital, Emocal, Sepram, Seropram, Citox, Cital)
dapoxetine (Priligy)
escitalopram (Lexapro, Cipralex, Seroplex, Esertia)
fluoxetine
(Depex, Prozac, Fontex, Seromex, Seronil, Sarafem, Ladose, Motivest,
Flutop, Fluctin (EUR), Fluox (NZ), Depress (UZB), Lovan (AUS), Prodep
(IND))
fluvoxamine (Luvox, Fevarin, Faverin, Dumyrox, Favoxil, Movox, Floxyfral)
indalpine (Upstene) (discontinued)
paroxetine (Paxil, Seroxat, Sereupin, Aropax, Deroxat, Divarius, Rexetin, Xetanor, Paroxat, Loxamine, Deparoc)
sertraline (Zoloft, Lustral, Serlain, Asentra)
zimelidine (Zelmid, Normud) (discontinued)
Finally, and I know I am howling at the moon here, but I am also holding out hope that there is an Oath Keeping remnant left among those in the Law Imposement profession, you Policemen must honor your oath and support and defend the Constitution... even against domestic enemies! When the Police Chief, or the City Councilman or the Mayor, or the Governor, or the President, makes the next proposal to nullify the rights of the free people of these United States, Stand up and say "NO!" Say "NO! You do not speak for me. You do not speak for us! We stand with the free people of our community and our State. We will not trample the rights of the citizenry, no matter what excuse you use, nor how rich the enticement!" Policemen, if you are not willing to do that, then you have defined yourself as an enemy of the people you supposedly serve.
I will also echo what Kent said, but I cannot say it any better:
"Put innocent people in a place where the good guys are forbidden to have
guns. Make sure escape is made difficult- a bottleneck is good,
especially if there are doors that can be locked in a "lock-down" so
that no one can get out of harm's way. Propose some new anti-gun
"laws". Activate the shooter. Then scream that people who didn't kill
or harm anyone must be punished for the acts of a bad guy who broke
every law in existence in order to carry out his act.
A person who has no compunction about murdering children will NOT obey your newest anti-gun "law". And neither will anyone else who sees that you are handing society over to the murderers a little more with every new anti-liberty "law" you parasites propose, pass, and enforce. It is past time to say "Enough! Not one more inch!"
A person who has no compunction about murdering children will NOT obey your newest anti-gun "law". And neither will anyone else who sees that you are handing society over to the murderers a little more with every new anti-liberty "law" you parasites propose, pass, and enforce. It is past time to say "Enough! Not one more inch!"
We will shortly see if any Americans have any testicular fortitude left.
3 comments:
Longbow,
I am not sure if you are serious about your suggestion to ban SSRI drugs. If not, this fits in to your article perfectly- pointing out that reason based on the logical fallacy of confusing correlation versus causation. Guns were a common factor in each shooting, so the enemies of the 2nd and of natural rights and civil liberties response is to ban guns, a grossly illogical action. Why not ban the other common factors instead? Through your suggestion of banning SSRIs, you create a metaphor of their flawed reasoning. If you are serious, however, then your reasoning is no different from theirs on this matter, logically speaking. Men seem to be a common factor in these shootings, men with guns. Maybe it would make more 'sense' for the government to ban guns for men? haha.
*edit: Sentence two should have read "pointing out that reason based on the logical fallacy of confusing correlation versus causation just doesn't make sense"
This is actually posted on the wrong blog entry, but...
My comment was indeed "tongue in cheek", meaning, if you are in the mood to ban something, and can think of nothing better to do... then try banning SSRIs.
No, I do not believe that substances are responsible for man's actions any more than inanimate objects are.
I do see other nefarious work here though.
Post a Comment